Web development , php , ajax , symfony, framework, zend
Over the last decade Apple Computers has made a phenomenal comeback that I believe is something that will be studied in business schools if its not already being done. I would even go far to say that Apple’s comeback should be studied from a branding perspective.
The Think Different campaign, launched in 1997, was a key factor in Apple’s recovery from financial difficulty and reinvigorating their brand with creativity and re-establish lost brand.
After this campaign, Apple has had many creative campaigns that today has positioned their brand as not just a computer for creatives but for the everyday computer user. However, it’s the ‘Think Different’ campaign that sparked it all.
The brilliance in this campaign is that it was refreshing to see our heroes being honoured but more importantly, there was someone everyone can relate to. It marked the beginning when clearly Apple is no longer looking to be perceived as a niche product, that is, for creatives only.
Why should it? Designers aren’t the only type of creative people in the world and Apple recognized that even though designers were loyal followers, to truly bring the company back, they have to appeal to creatives outside that niche.
‘Think Different’ channeled the creativity of some of these key innovators, muscians, filmakers, artists and others saying, hey, we advocate all forms of creativity because creativity is about thinking different, it’s about changing the world.
It doesn’t matter who you are, where you’ve come from or the colour of your skin, at some point, one of these ad touches you and reminds you of a defining moment in history where these people made a change.
The ‘Think Different’ campaign is undoubtedly all about branding. There was strategic decision to not include any Apple product in the ad and placement of computer ads in fashion magazine makes a big statement. The key goal was to re-gain what their brand lost and this is evidence by Jobs statement at a party he held for his staff at Palto Alto, “our brand is the most – or at least one of the most – valuable things we have going for us now.” – Davenet
This campaign was inspired and built on campaigns like Nike’s “just do it” and MILK’s “got milk” campaigns. This is mostly true because of his mention of these campaigns at the Palo Alto party in celebration of the campaign.
Click here to view the embedded video.
There’s a part where the executive producer said she saw something in the materials that she would never have been able to articulate. That’s very interesting because it shows that sometimes, you really have to see it to know that’s what you want.
What do you think of this? Should creatives always know before hand what they want because we’re visual thinkers? Is it a case where out thinking evolves as we go? Or is it really a case of “we know it when we see it”?
Click here to view the embedded video.
‘Think Different’ is not just another campaign but one that revitalize a brand that’s worth billions today. It’s a campaign that increased sales and placed Apple on the right path. It did not just send the message to consumers but Apple staff clearly clear got the message.
Do you think this campaign played such an integral role at Apple? What’s an example of another campaign that has such an impact on a company? Let me know your thoughts.
In: web resources
18 Feb 2010
Buried in a Reuters report on Foxconn, a division of Taiwan’s Hon Hai Precision Industry, is a description of an attack on a journalist visiting a Foxconn factory in China while chasing down a lead on an Apple product. The journalist was taking pictures of the factory from a public road, he says, when two guards attacked him and tried to drag him into the factory:
In China, a Reuters reporter found out the hard way how seriously some Apple suppliers take security.
Tipped by a worker outside the Longhua complex that a nearby Foxconn plant was manufacturing parts for Apple too, our correspondent hopped in a taxi for a visit to the facility in Guanlan, which makes products for a range of companies.
As he stood on the public road taking photos of the front gate and security checkpoint, a guard shouted. The reporter continued snapping photos before jumping into a waiting taxi. The guard blocked the vehicle and ordered the driver to stop, threatening to strip him of his taxi license.
The correspondent got out and insisted he was within his rights as he was on the main road. The guard grabbed his arm. A second guard ran over, and with a crowd of Foxconn workers watching, they tried dragging him into the factory.
The reporter asked to be let go. When that didn’t happen, he jerked himself free and started walking off. The older guard kicked him in the leg, while the second threatened to hit him again if he moved. A few minutes later, a Foxconn security car came along but the reporter refused to board it. He called the police instead.
After the authorities arrived and mediated, the guards apologized and the matter was settled. The reporter left without filing a complaint, though the police gave him the option of doing so.
“You’re free to do what you want,” the policeman explained, “But this is Foxconn and they have a special status here. Please understand.”
Foxconn, which makes products for Apple, Sony, HP, Amazon, Nokia, Motorola, Nintendo, Microsoft, Dell and Cisco (and just about everyone else), has been criticized much in the past for sweat shop working conditions and the alleged suicide of an employee who allegedly lost an iPhone prototype.
Neither of those stories could lead to much given the lack of evidence, witnesses, etc. But this attack of a journalist certainly left witnesses.
If the attack had occurred in the U.S. it would almost certainly lead to lawsuits against Foxconn and criminal charges against the guards. In China, however, all the police will say is “But this is Foxconn and they have a special status here. Please understand.”
Foxconn is massive – perhaps exporting as much as $100 billion worth of hardware a year out of China. And they are under great pressure to maintain confidentiality for their clients.
But attacking a journalist, or anyone for that matter, goes too far. Foxconn will not be held to account for what happened. But maybe it’s time we started to hold those companies that do business with Foxconn – Apple, Sony, HP, Amazon, Nokia, Motorola, Nintendo, Microsoft, Dell, Cisco and other, responsible. By not buying products produced by Foxconn. Because next time someone (else) may end up dead after an interaction with Foxconn. Perhaps if they lose a few big name clients the company won’t be in the news quite so often alongside headlines involving sweat shops, physical attacks and suicides.
This blog delivers stylish and dynamic news for designers and web-developers on all subjects of design, ranging from: CSS, Ajax, Javascript, web design, graphics, typography, advertising & much more. Our goal is to help you communicate effectively on the web with an engaging website or functional interface.