Web development , php , ajax , symfony, framework, zend
In: web resources
11 Feb 2010When WebProNews hit Vegas for the CES 2010 conference, we came across a number of new and interesting gadgets.
The MakerBot’s CupCake CNC is a 3D printer/fabricator that can make just about anything you want. As long as the object you desire can be made out of ABS plastic and stays in a size range of 4″x4″x6".
Once the design is input using 3D modeling software or by visiting Thingiverse for a pre-made template, MakerBot turns the creation into reality. The machine begins ‘printing’ and soon after, a 3D model of the design requested materializes right before your eyes.
These 3D fabricators are priced between $750-$950 and have qualities that even attracted major companies like Google. The MakerBot representatives stated Google has invested in multiple CupCake CNCs. For what? We can only wonder….
Related Articles:
> Looking at Polaroid’s Photo Sharing Service
> A Close Up with Sony’s New Personal Internet Viewer
> The World’s Smallest USB Drive and Portable Hard Drive
This blog delivers stylish and dynamic news for designers and web-developers on all subjects of design, ranging from: CSS, Ajax, Javascript, web design, graphics, typography, advertising & much more. Our goal is to help you communicate effectively on the web with an engaging website or functional interface.
7 Responses to 3D Printer Can Make You Anything
Sheba
March 12th, 2010 at 9:39 pm
We have made signs for our company from Aroma Advertising. They are in Dubai for the last 14 years. Actually it is a pleasure to deal with them. Whenever I have a requirement, I always call them.
They are very friendly people, and the price is really good as they have all the facilities inhouse.
Tel : 04 3965235
Mrudul S
March 15th, 2010 at 5:40 am
buttermilk is a type of milk which has certain cultures added to it, and is fermented to give it a slight sour flavour and thickness(like yogurt). despite it's name, its very low in fat and is quite creamy from the milk solids. you could easily replace this in a recipe with regular milk, or yogurt etc… but doesnt taste as good as buttermilk!
Thomas S
March 22nd, 2010 at 6:40 am
i had a similar problem when the wire linking my printer to the pc had a bad connection, a new wire has sorted this out for good!
marketwizard
March 23rd, 2010 at 6:06 pm
If you haven't done this already then you need to make your page titles reflect the content of your page. I've put my site url below which may help demonstrate this.
red.baron88
March 27th, 2010 at 5:20 pm
No simulator is identical to the real thing, but realism varies among different simulators, and since simulators are not always used to simulate every aspect of flight, most of them are good at certain parts of the simulation, and not very good at others.
The Google flight simulator is at the low end of the scale in terms of realism.
You can get vastly better realism from PC programs that simulate flight specifically, such as Microsoft Flight Simulator or X-Plane. They provide a good general simulation of flight, especially if you have a joystick and other controls attached to your computer. Because the computer doesn't move and has only a single screen (instead of wide windows), PC-based simulations are more accurate for flight by instruments than they are for visual flight. Various add-ons for these simulators are available that greatly increase accuracy and realism, and they can also be used on networks so that you can fly among other "pilots" with air traffic "controllers."
Beyond that, the price goes up, but the accuracy improves. Some dedicated simulators for the PC simulate specific things, such as instrument flight only, and some of them, in specific configurations and with an instructor present, are certified by aviation authorities and the time spent on them can be logged for the purpose of obtaining a license (although you still need lots of time in a real plane to get the license). Programs like X-Plane are not expensive, but when you get into certified simulators, you add one or more zeros to the price.
Beyond that, you get into purpose-built simulators that simulate many of the physical aspects of flying. At the top of the scale are full-motion simulators that exactly duplicate the behavior of specific, real aircraft. They move like the real thing, and they look and behave just like the real thing (from inside the cockpit). They are certified and the time spent on them can be officially logged. They are very expensive ($15-$30 million), and time on them is charged by the hour. They are used mostly by airline pilots for practice and certification and other necessary purposes (airline pilots must constantly remain current on various procedures that they are unlikely to ever encounter in real life). Despite the cost, using simulators for commercial pilots is still cheaper than handing them a real airliner just for practice.
If you like flying on the Google simulator, try a PC-based simulation program like Microsoft Flight Simulator. If you really like that, there's a good chance that you might enjoy flying for real, so you might consider going for a pilot's license (or even a flying career).
tvjames
March 27th, 2010 at 8:14 pm
Alex –
According to this article
GBuy and Google Checkout are not the same thing.
Apparently "Gbuy" hasn't actually surfaced yet, though I imagine they're working on it.
Being Google, they'd probably look closely at PayPal to figure out what they're doing well (and what they're doing poorly) and come out with a product with a stronger feature set.
And then eBay would ban people from using it on their service to protect PayPal.
At least that's my guess.
Hope this is helpful,
James
ollie
April 3rd, 2010 at 3:35 am
i too also have a mac, but i run most of my 3d modeling sotfware off of parallel's desktop–its like having a pc on your mac. most 3d software is only compatable with windows.
if you want to just design cars, i suggest trying out alias/maya, it is what GM, Toyota, Nissan, and etc. use. if you are a student, you can get the software for a reasonable price. however, this program has an intimidating interface and is fairly difficult. you basically create your designs out of knitted surfaces and eventually you will be able to get realistic renderings and results.
rhino is another good software to use, mostly used by architects, but you can model a variety of products—cars to furniture.
solidworks is my personal favorite, however, making cars can be a little difficult. i have designed motorcycles and a variety of consumer products using this software, however it can be very time consuming. a cool thing about solidworks is that it can make technical drawings based off of your 3d model.
basically, most 3d modelling software can be difficult for beginners, but eventually you will learn, and it will be easy. this is the case whether you teach yourself (youtube is a surprising good reference) or take professional training.
—good luck