Tech Today: Tech Wealth Gap Widens, Google’s China Partners Issue Plea

In: IT news

18 Mar 2010

Tech Today gathers all the biggest technology news of the morning’s Wall Street Journal into one place for your reading pleasure.

Tech Wealth Gap Widens: A handful of cash-rich companies are consolidating power in the tech industry, using their wealth to expand into new businesses and making it harder for small competitors to break through.

Start-Ups Take Chips Into 3-D: Silicon Valley start-ups Tier Logic and Tabula are breaking from conventional chip designs by taking a step into the third dimension to squeeze more features onto chips.

Google’s China Partners Issue Plea: A group of Google’s partners in China have sent an impassioned plea to the Internet giant, saying their businesses are in jeopardy if Google closes its Chinese search engine and demanding to know how they will be compensated.

Google’s Nexus One to Compete With iPhone: Google has started selling a version of its Nexus One phone that runs on AT&T’s 3G network, putting it in direct competition with Apple’s iPhone.

App With a Knack for Contacts: Xobni Mobile for BlackBerry compiles contact information on the BlackBerry for anyone you’ve emailed—regardless of whether or not you saved their information in your address book.

Twitter Working on Chinese Site: Twitter’s co-founder said “it’s just a matter of time” before users can register in Chinese, though access to the popular service is still blocked in China.

Perking Up Passover’s Plagues on Twitter: Building on a growing movement to add a bit of fun to the tale of plagues and pestilence, some rabbis are acting out the Passover story in 140-character Twitter messages.


Go to Source

3 Responses to Tech Today: Tech Wealth Gap Widens, Google’s China Partners Issue Plea

Avatar

tx_trotter95

March 27th, 2010 at 9:35 am

You make a lot of assumptions, and the wealth gap does need to be reduced, by far!

What is wrong with voting down tax cuts? The only people Bush has given them are usually earning between, on average, $800,030 to $26.4 Million. They have had 3 Tax Cuts!, while the VA Hospitals have had 2 budget cuts! It isn't nice to steal from the poor to give to the wealthy.

Taxes are going to have to be increased due to the Republican fiscal nightmare! And I assume most will not be on the backs of those earning less that $100,000!

There are 2 Americas: 13 million of 132 million who filed tax returns make over $100,000 a year! One-half of America makes $30,000 or less.Those 119 Million are who Edwards is talking about!

" Corporate profits have grown an average of 13% a year since 2001, adjusted for inflation. It's working for CEOs who've seen their pay go from 24 times the typical worker's in 1965, to 262 times the typical worker in 2005. And it's working for Americans with incomes at the very top. In 2005, all income gains went to the top 10% of households, while the bottom 90% saw their incomes decline, in spite of the fact that worker productivity has increased for six years. H. Clinton.

So please spare me the "I am so concerned about the little people BS"! And it WILL NOT increase taxes across the board. My what grand assumptions. That certainly is not how tax cuts were given, is it?

Besides, you have run up 3 1/2 TRILLION in additional debt! How do you intend to pay for it. You have never even had CLOSE to a balanced budget. A lot of Welfare for Corporations, but that does not translate into good jobs for Americans, especially when they are hiring illegals to work on 94 Million dollar no-bid Federal contracts.

Avatar

Cher

March 29th, 2010 at 5:11 pm

1. There is no reason in the world for one religion to comment on another religion. That's bullying, not spirituality. This is a general statement of importance, but I'll answer anyway.

2. On b) the Noahide law requires all to live under a system of justice. It doesn't require that it be a "Jewish" one. Even under the Russia Czars with their less than sane judicial system, the Jewish communities used to form "societies". Officially they were for various topics like weaving, but they were used as a judicial system where Rabbis hear situations & rendered decisions. It avoided the horrors of the Czar's setup.

3) Rabbis took statements from Torah & Talmud's oral Torah & interpret them. The verses can be vague, contradictory & need clarification. So to say the Rabbis decided, not scripture, is to misunderstand their role. Also it's to misunderstand how Jews read scripture as an analytical process. Non-Jews aren't taught this process about Judaism & think our Rabbis have the same roles their ministers & priests do of interpreting things FOR you. Instead, the Rabbi's processes are written down — hence the Talmud — for all to see & continue to evaluate. So if we trust that the Rabbis saw a certain way to interpret Torah to conclude that sacrifices are no longer appropriate,…others have studied that & it is accepted because it's been analyzed to death already.

Which leads to the next problem in answering your question. I haven't read & analyzed all the commentary myself, so I don't know. If an area interests me, then I read up on it. However, it takes pages & a long time to do anything correctly. I'll star it & maybe someone who has will come along.

This leads back to the original point. It's not okay to judge other religions. It gets even worse when judging them without understanding the tools they use or how they work. Unfortunately Christianity tends to teach about Judaism without understanding or teaching the very basics of Jewish process.

I understand the intent of your question was just to ask about some scriptures. But it was also to comment on whether Jews should be doing something once you have the information. We're happy. So, it's not anyone else's business, unless we're hurting someone.

Side note: Rabbi was a later term. Many of those referenced in Talmud are called sages (or nothing in particular), not Rabbis.

I do know prayer was decided as an ample substitute. This site may have more http://www.whatjewsbelieve.org.

===============
You are getting answers. You're just choosing to discard them. And those "other" topics ARE the topic. You really do need to listen to our requests to understand us & respect us. Anything less is unkind when someone asks you to listen to their concerns about attitude toward them or misunderstanding of them.

On the Torah law (& please stop calling it the laws of Moses. In Jewish religion, God gave the law. It's not Moses's. We use that term but your overusing & using it incorrectly I've noticed over time.) As explained the requirement for a court system (hence the use of judges) is from what's called the Noahide laws. There's a website I think http://www.noahide.org but also there's a link about them from the site Kismet & I provided. They are from the time of Noah, not Moses. So the answer to your question was:
1. It wasn't the Moses law (God's law from Mt. Sinai) to require a court system. The law didn't require judges but rather required a COURT system (ie. a method for justice, not judges per se).
2. Jews are still following it. Have you noticed any Jews living someplace without a court system? So your request for a statement of exception makes no sense. I hope that helps clarify.

Again, Rabbis don't make up things. They clarify interpretation & do it in writing so others can verify for themselves. It's rather like mathematics. Mathematicians don't "make up things" even then they are newly derived from prior work. Other mathematicians can read & decide for themselves if the logic makes sense & decide that it is a continuation of the SAME math theory that already exists. They don't invent new laws, but use the SAME laws & process to derive new applications.

Please try to understand rather then insisting on fitting Judaism into your picture of Judaism. Your questions themselves are based on false inputs, so your not getting answers because your ARE getting answers. You're just rejecting them because your not reading them & understanding them. If you do have follow up questions — based on including the concepts in these answers — please by all means do ask.

I don't mean to sound harsh or anything, but I thought I explained all this the first time. Also, I've seen your disrespect for Judaism. I see now that it's based on not accepting that it doesn't look like what you've learned someplace. Really, it's not as illogical as you've been lead to believe. We aren't being "told" something by Rabbis. We ourselves study our own scriptures. Rabbis just do more of it but THEY DON'T tell us what to think. Totally different than most religions that way!!!! Pretty cool too that it's so :) .

==============
Gershon
That explains it. He's been running after Jewish questions, trying to disprove that Jews are still Jews & it's some European invented religion, i.e a purely political agenda & attack on Israel. That gets bizarre since we regularly reference works written way back (Talmud) & by sages from centuries after NOT in Europe such as Maimonides (who lived in Alexandria under Muslim rule.) I guess he hasn't looked & seen that for any topic, the trail of references goes ALL the way back.

======
As for using my comments in your own sites. Don't. I would you not to, neither with nor without my name.

Avatar

Jacob C

May 11th, 2010 at 3:12 am

Yes,
If you are even considering starting a website then you have the resources to become successful. I use the internet and work from home or the local coffee shop and make $12,000 a month with my company. This is something that anyone can do if they have the willpower or motivation. I really urge you to take yourself to the next level and actually earn an income from the internet. Don't live the pipedream and have your work stolen. Live the dream of building success from the internet.
http://www.CaptureYourSuccess.net/top-income-yahoo.html

Comment Form

About this blog

This blog delivers stylish and dynamic news for designers and web-developers on all subjects of design, ranging from: CSS, Ajax, Javascript, web design, graphics, typography, advertising & much more. Our goal is to help you communicate effectively on the web with an engaging website or functional interface.