dedicated server - Programming Blog

My Hosting Plane On Lunarpage.com And…

15 Mar 2010

hi all,

i have a hosting plan on lunarpages.com and it will expire at the end of this month, so i want any of a promotion codes or charging coupons to discounting.

Hosting info;
Basic Hosting Plan

I’ll waiting your replies,:rolleyes:

For more information click here.

No Comments
Tags: coupons

Ubiquity And Network To Europe

In: dedicated server| web hosting

15 Mar 2010

Since 2 weeks of so, we’re having horrible connections between Europe and our servers in the United States (Ubiqiuty).
Our monitoring server is located in Chicago and is constantly sending false alerts that servers are offline.
Even connectivity between their own POPs (Chicago to Los Angeles) fails frequently.
Ticket has been open since the 2nd of March, and each time they are putting the blame on one of their carriers.

Is anyone having the same kind of issues with them?

Here some traceroutes:

Code:

traceroute to 217.18.70.7 (217.18.70.7), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets

 1  64.120.12.17.novanetworks.net (64.120.12.17)  0.330 ms  0.420 ms  0.549 ms

 2  g0-6.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.177)  4.099 ms  4.095 ms  4.096 ms

 3  te4-5.cr01.lga01.us.mzima.net (69.174.120.73)  21.936 ms  21.988 ms  21.971 ms

 4  gi3-0.nyc-002-inter-1.interoute.net (198.32.160.102)  22.179 ms  22.184 ms *

 5  * * *

 6  * * *

 7  * * *

 8  * * *

 9  * * *

10  * * *

11  * * *

12  * * *

13  * * *

14  * * *

15  * * *

16  * * *

17  * * *

18  * * *

19  * * *

20  * * *

21  * * *

22  * * *

23  * * *

24  * * *

25  * * *

26  * * *

27  * * *

28  * * *

29  * * *

30  * * *

Code:

traceroute to frog.serverffs.com (94.23.26.143), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets

 1  64.120.12.17.novanetworks.net (64.120.12.17)  0.315 ms  0.421 ms  0.537 ms

 2  te1-4.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.65)  1.264 ms  1.347 ms  1.452 ms

 3  ae1-40g.cr2.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.137)  0.975 ms  0.958 ms  0.988 ms

 4  te8-3.ar3.CHI2.gblx.net (69.31.110.225)  1.366 ms  1.410 ms te9-3.ar3.CHI2.gblx.net (69.31.110.233)  1.496 ms

 5  * * *

 6  * * *

 7  * * *

 8  * * *

 9  * * *

10  * * *

11  * * *

12  * * *

13  * * *

14  * * *

15  * * *

16  * * *

17  * * *

18  * * *

19  * * *

20  * * *

21  * * *

22  * * *

23  * * *

24  * * *

25  * * *

26  * * *

27  * * *

28  * * *

29  * * *

30  * * *

Code:

traceroute to cheetah.serverffs.com (174.34.155.106), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets

 1  64.120.12.17.novanetworks.net (64.120.12.17)  3.778 ms  3.902 ms  4.041 ms

 2  ip65-47-180-113.z180-47-65.customer.algx.net (65.47.180.113)  0.910 ms  0.911 ms  0.908 ms

 3  ge11-1-4d0.mcr2.chicago-il.us.xo.net (207.88.172.13)  1.021 ms  1.014 ms  1.017 ms

 4  ae1d0.mcr1.chicago-il.us.xo.net (216.156.1.81)  1.291 ms  1.277 ms  1.242 ms

 5  216.156.0.161.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.0.161)  62.548 ms  62.530 ms  62.501 ms

 6  te-3-2-0.rar3.dallas-tx.us.xo.net (207.88.12.14)  62.415 ms  62.214 ms  62.200 ms

 7  vb12.rar3.la-ca.us.xo.net (207.88.12.46)  62.248 ms  62.392 ms  62.368 ms

 8  ae0d0.mcr1.la-ca.us.xo.net (216.156.0.114)  62.084 ms  61.834 ms  61.821 ms

 9  ae1d0.mcr1.santaana-ca.us.xo.net (216.156.1.58)  61.779 ms  61.762 ms  61.775 ms

10  * * *

11  * * *

12  * * *

13  * * *

14  * * *

15  * * *

16  * * *

17  * * *

18  * * *

19  * * *

20  * * *

21  * * *

22  * * *

23  * * *

24  * * *

25  * * *

26  * * *

27  * * *

28  * * *

29  * * *

30  * * *

For more information click here.

(2) Comments
Tags: ar3, byte packets, cr2, g0, hops, interoute, monitoring server, te1, traceroute

Reliable FTP Host

In: dedicated server| web hosting

15 Mar 2010

Hi All,

As many of you know, due to its coming of age before firewalls, NAT etc. FTP can be a problematic protocol. Its insecure, temperamental, open ports left and right and is a downright pain to work with.

It is, however, a fact of life in certain industries.

Our firm has a need for a super reliable FTP host. FTP is all we want/need. It needs to run as perfectly as FTP can possibly run, it needs to be setup to support a whole raft of different client options. We don’t need high transfer volumes, we need reliability and proper configuration above all else.

We are not overly sensitive to cost.

We have our own (colocated) server infrastructure (2x datacenters), but we don’t feel we have the expertise to configure FTP properly through our firewalls etc.

Suggestions?

For more information click here.