Fed/Treasury covert tightening alert: $200 Billion in liquidity to be withdrawn over next 8 weeks
On the heels of the surprise discount window rate hike late last week, and on the eve of Bernanke’s Congressional testimony, speculation abounds as to the when and where of the next round of tightening. We need look no further than the US Treasury press room, as it has announced today a revival of sorts for its Supplementary Financing Program (SFP).
Remember the SFP? It’s back, though it really never went away. Originally created in September, 2008 to provide a pool of funds that could be drawn upon by the Fed in emergencies without adding to excess reserves (before the Fed had the power to pay interest on excess reserves), the SFP hit its peak amount in November, 2008 at $558.9 billion. Thereafter, it was quickly drawn down to about $200 billion by February 2009, where it remained until Treasury ran into debt ceiling issues in September and announced it would be wound down to $15 billion. In fact, by January 6, 2010, only $5 billion remained.
Today, Treasury announced as follows:
February 23, 2010
TG-560Treasury Issues Debt Management Guidance on the
Supplementary Financing ProgramWASHINGTON –The U.S. Department of Treasury today issued the following statement on the Supplementary Financing Program (SFP):
“Treasury anticipates that the balance in the Treasury’s Supplementary Financing Account will increase from its current level of $5 billion to $200 billion. This will restore the SFP back to the level maintained between February and September 2009.
This action will be completed over the next two months in the form of eight $25 billion, 56-day SFP bills. Starting tomorrow, SFP auctions will be held each Wednesday at 11:30 a.m. EST, unless otherwise noted.”
###
We speculated after the September 2009 wind down announcement that it (1) would provide another $185 in liquidity for risk markets as the cash management bills that financed the program were not rolled over and returned to primary dealers, and (2) would increase demand for short term bills. Since the process will now be reversed, it is reasonable now to believe the outcomes will be reversed as well. Indeed, as Zero Hedge noted in a similar story earlier, demand is already disappearing from indirects in short term bill auctions.
With the brunt of the $200 billion cash management bill sales expected to be picked up primary dealers, this will have the same effect as adding up to $200 billion to bank nonborrowed excess reserves (NBER) on deposit with the Fed. As bank NBER is just north of $1 trillion, a 20% increase over eight weeks in the amount of non-borrowed money locked up at the Fed is material. At a time when Agency and Agency MBS are drawing to a close, and with M2 money supply flat, this de facto tightening move is a bit alarming.
Further, using the 13 week T-Bill rate of 0.1% as a proxy for the shorter duration 56 day (8 week) bill, it yields less than half the 0.25% paid by the Fed on excess reserves. Accordingly, even if existing excess reserves are used to finance the SFP, resulting in a net wash in money locked up at the Fed, the marginal profit provided by this carry trade and so needed by the large banks will be materially diminished. Under the same net wash scenario, this move could also be a precurser (test run?) for the term deposit facility proposed by the Fed.
For anyone who doubts the intent of these actions, we need only revisit the original press release by Treasury:
September 17, 2008
Today, the Treasury Department announced the initiation of a temporary Supplementary Financing Program. The program will consist of a series of Treasury bill auctions, separate from Treasury’s current borrowing program, with the proceeds from these auctions to be maintained in an account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Funds in this account serve to drain reserves from the banking system, and will therefore offset the reserve impact of recent Federal Reserve lending and liquidity initiatives.
As the Fed now has myriad tools to offset the reserve impact of liquidity initiatives and is unlikely to restart such initiatives in the near term, this is purely and simply a reserve draining mechanism that will at best erode bank profits and, at worst, shrink an already precariously perched money supply. We will analyze Fed statistics over the coming weeks and update as to which is the more likely scenario.
It’s important not to become too bearish in the short term on long term news, especially on a net down day in equities. For those that subscribe to our daily reports, this does not affect our view that the US Dollar is topping this week and due for a modest 38% to 50% correction of the recent up leg. A concurrent equities rally would still accompany, but we are now less confident in its ultimate potential.
about 4 months ago
While the FED does hold some of the treasury bonds, it is hardly the sole holder, and is as likely to buy it's holdings from the market as it is directly from the treasury.
That said, when the bills and bonds held by the FED come due, the treasury must re-pay the FED the same as it would any other lender. It can re-pay with tax receipts or with new borrowings.
The 'inflation tax' occurs as a result of monetary policy on the part of the FED, not necessarily the result of it's treasury holdings, although the FED selling treasury bonds on the market is one way it increases monetary supply (causing inflation).
Hopefully that helps, perhaps a link to a more professional site will help:
First on money supply, the FED in general, the tresury department bureau of public debt.
about 4 months ago
Is this the way things are run in Washington? I suppose we could ask Mr. Schlozman, the former Bush DOJ Civil Rights Division supervisor for some guidance in respect to the nominating process. Should we do that?
Geitner paid his taxes after wrangling with the IRS for more than two years. Personally, I suspect he probably got some lousy legal or accounting advice. Maybe he even got hard-headed about paying the taxes because he wrongly, but honestly, believed he was not responsible for that tax liability. I'm not sure, however, how that reflects on his ability to run the Treasury Department.
You do realize that the greatest national security threat facing the United States of America is the threat of a contracting economy. Right? America's hard military power and soft diplomatic power are functions of America's economic power. National security, therefore, is a function of American economic power.
If you and other Republicans want to try to knock down Geitner's nomination because he displayed arguably poor judgment by not promptly paying a personal income tax liability, that is your prerogative. Denying him confirmation on that basis will not help the American economy and, in fact, it will do substantial harm if he is the best qualified candidate for the job.
But since your concern, as ever, is playing partisan politics, I suspect you aren't concerned with that possibility. In fact, I suspect you would welcome further economic declines if it would serve your pathetic political agenda. Democrats, on the other hand, haven't got that luxury since they have to solve the Citigroup problem, pass a responsible stimulus package, find the money to pay for it all while under pressure to enact middle class tax relief, make decisions relating to prosecuting an expensive and important war in Afghanistan while slowly disentangling from Iraq, and figuring out whether there is a way to keep a lid on the Israeli-Hamas and Israeli-Hezbollah conflicts and move towards peace and, if so, how to accomplish it, all while federal tax revenues are rapidly declining.
So you go off and play while the grown ups, including Tim Geitner, try to sweep up the mess you left behind and rebuild for the future. Okay? Look there's a swing open. If you run fast you can get there before the other two year olds. Just tie your shoe laces first.
about 4 months ago
lol
about 4 months ago
They should lower expenses by defining a wealth standard. Anyone in excess of a certain amount of personal wealth should no longer receive benefits. I know, it sounds harsh but what good does it do to send a check to billionaires and millionaires?
about 4 months ago
I don't think your hair product should irritate acne unless it made your hair really oily. This is what I recommend:
Consider taking a shower both before you go to bed and as soon as you get up. I use Neutrogena's Deep Clean Scrub in the shower. Maybe even look for a clay mask you can put on and rinse off before bed. I put on Differin cream on my blemishes before bed.
Also remember to change your pillow case daily! It holds the oils from your face.
Remember to keep your oils from your hands and hair away from your face as much as possible.
Also, look for concealers that will cover blemishes but won't make them oilier. Both Clearasil and Neutrogena have a good concealer out.
If all else fails, go to a dermatologist and they'll give you stronger stuff, both external and internal stuff you can take.
about 4 months ago
You can fly from anywhere to anywhere as long as you have the appropriate visas.
about 2 months ago
The 1000 stands for a data transfer rate
of 1000 megabits per second.
Base gives you information about the media (wires of some sort)
'-T' tells you which of the several competing 1000Base implimentations
has been used. You need to research the details, though, as the '-T'
by itself has no meaning -it's just part of the name.
I Found These Videos From A cisco seller to be very educational:
LX, LH, SX are terms used in fibre optic communications and designate
the frequency & signalling standard to be used over the fibre line.
SX is commonly used within one building between closely adjacent
buildings; the 'S' hints at "short distance". There is a specific
frequency of light that is used for SX, & it expects a type of
fibre known as "multimode" — which is a type of fibre that can
carry several signals simultaneously but tends to disperse
the signals relatively quickly.
LX uses a different frequency, and is more suitable for longer
distances. The 'L' can be read as a hint for "long distance". LX